AIG Survey of Eco-Efficiency Procedures in Manufacturing, Financial Year 2002/2003
Contents
Overview
Contact Information
Return to topSummary
 |
It is a goal of industry and the Australian Government to improve the economic efficiency and environmental performance of Australian businesses. To achieve this goal, Department of Environment and Heritage (DEH) and industry associations are working together to encourage businesses to adopt measures that can improve their eco-efficiency, that is, measures that enable them to produce goods and services with less energy and fewer natural resources, resulting in less waste and pollution. A survey is a necessary component of encouraging businesses to improve their eco-efficiency, as it will provide baseline data which future improvements may be measured.
The survey will encourage Ai Group members to adopt eco-efficiency measures by:
- encouraging member companies to measure their inputs (energy, water, materials) & outputs (wastes and products), so that they can identify and make resource savings;
- establishing eco-efficiency benchmarks for the Ai Group, so that each business can compare its eco-efficiency with the benchmarks for the Association;
- providing information to government on changes over time to the eco-efficiency performance of the Ai Group, to assist with government policy-making; and
- enabling Ai Group to report publicly on its members environmental activities and impacts.
The main topics covered are:
- whether the business has environmental plans and systems;
- physical quantities of energy and water used, air emissions and waste products;
- physical quantities and financial values of products;
- whether the business has adopted eco-efficiency measures, and the outcomes.
The physical and financial data will be used to develop "eco-efficiency ratios" for the industry. In particular, Ai Group is looking to develop eco-efficiency benchmarking data that can be measured against expenditure. This is consistent with our approach in other and planned benchmarking surveys which use activities as a ratio of expenditure to develop standards. Ai Group believes that by having expenditure as a common variable in our ratios we can compare eco-efficiency activities with other business activities in data already (planned to be) collected by Ai Group. As well, Ai Group may well want to undertake some regression analysis of the results with expenditure being a key variable for analysis.
While we recognise that this may require additional effort by respondents, experience with previous surveys and in the pilot testing suggest that companies unable/unwilling to provide expenditure data will simply skip these survey fields.
The initial sample size is 500 units. The main considerations in setting this figure are respondent burden, cost and the target response rate.
|
Return to top
Reference Period & Frequency
 | Reference Period: | Financial Year 2002/2003 |
 | Frequency: | Annual |
 | First run: | 2001 |
Return to top
Response Rates
Return to top
Clearance Information
 | Survey reviewed by |  |
 | Stat. Clearing House: | Financial Year 2002/2003 |
 | Status: | Approved |
 | For additional clearance information, please contact the Statistical Clearing House by phone, fax, post or email. |
Return to top
Quality Framework
This data quality framework has been published internationally (Brackstone G., Managing Data Quality in a Statistical Agency, (1999) Survey Methodology, Vol. 25, no. 2, Statistics Canada) and has been recommended by the ANAO as 'better practice' in specifying performance measures (ATO Performance Reporting under the Outcomes and Outputs Framework, Australian Taxation Office, Audit Report No.46 2000-01, pp63-64.) on advice from the ABS Statistical Consultancy Unit.
Return to Survey Contents
Relevance
The relevance of statistical information reflects the degree to which it meets the needs of the clients. It is usually described in terms of key user needs, key concepts and classifications used, the scope of the collection and the reference period. |
Why do you need to conduct a survey? (B1)
It is a goal of industry and the Australian Government to improve the economic efficiency and environmental performance of Australian businesses. To achieve this goal, Department of Environment and Heritage (DEH) and industry associations are working together to encourage businesses to adopt measures that can improve their eco-efficiency, that is, measures that enable them to produce goods and services with less energy and fewer natural resources, resulting in less waste and pollution. A survey is a necessary component of encouraging businesses to improve their eco-efficiency, as it will provide baseline data which future improvements may be measured.
How will the survey outputs meet the needs specified in B1? What are the target RSEs for the survey? (B2)
The survey will encourage Ai Group members to adopt eco-efficiency measures by:
- encouraging member companies to measure their inputs (energy, water, materials) & outputs (wastes and products), so that they can identify and make resource savings;
- establishing eco-efficiency benchmarks for the Ai Group, so that each business can compare its eco-efficiency with the benchmarks for the Association;
- providing information to government on changes over time to the eco-efficiency performance of the Ai Group, to assist with government policy-making; and
- enabling Ai Group to report publicly on its members environmental activities and impacts.
The main topics covered are:
- whether the business has environmental plans and systems;
- physical quantities of energy and water used, air emissions and waste products;
- physical quantities and financial values of products;
- whether the business has adopted eco-efficiency measures, and the outcomes.
The physical and financial data will be used to develop "eco-efficiency ratios" for the industry. In particular, Ai Group is looking to develop eco-efficiency benchmarking data that can be measured against expenditure. This is consistent with our approach in other and planned benchmarking surveys which use activities as a ratio of expenditure to develop standards. Ai Group believes that by having expenditure as a common variable in our ratios we can compare eco-efficiency activities with other business activities in data already (planned to be) collected by Ai Group. As well, Ai Group may well want to undertake some regression analysis of the results with expenditure being a key variable for analysis.
While we recognise that this may require additional effort by respondents, experience with previous surveys and in the pilot testing suggest that companies unable/unwilling to provide expenditure data will simply skip these survey fields.
The initial sample size is 500 units. The main considerations in setting this figure are respondent burden, cost and the target response rate.
Please specify the principal outputs or data items to be produced. (D1)
The data from the survey will provide valuable information on eco-efficiency practices for individual businesses, which will be able to benchmark their performance against the survey results. In time Ai Group will be looking to extend the data to cover a significantly larger number of companies within the Australian Industry Group membership. The survey will also provide initial data on eco-efficiency in the manufacturing industry such as:
- waste generation;
- recycling volumes, internal and external;
- expenditure on water, electricity and gas; and
- annual savings from eco-efficiency management.
Data will be published by business size (employment, sales volume) and industry sector.
What statistical data analysis techniques will be performed? (I5)
Frequency distributions and regression analysis.
What consideration has been given to the use of standards? Please specify. (D2)
Benchmarking will be applied against standard sales figure. Questions have been designed to reflect industry terminology, practices and standards.
What is the target population (scope) for the survey? (G1)
The target population is Australian Industry Group members.
How will you obtain the list of businesses (frame) from which the sample is to be selected? (G2)
A random sample of Ai Group members will be selected from our national membership database, with an over-weighting of large companies and under-weighting of small companies.
What is the type of unit on the frame to be used for the survey (e.g. farm, school, practice, GP, retail business)? (G3)
The sample unit will be the establishment.
What is (are) the method(s) of collecting the data (eg self-completion, telephone interviewing, face to face interviewing, etc)? Why was it (were they) chosen? (E3)
The survey will be a mailed out for self-completion. Telephone follow-up will be undertaken to lift the response rate.
The nature of the information sought has determined the data collection methodology. For instance, some of the data requires the respondent to consult accounts and business records, which is best done in the respondent’s own time.
To what reference period(s) does the survey refer? (A6)
The reference period will be the 2002/03 financial year.
Is the survey to be conducted once only or repeated? If repeated, with what frequency is the survey to be repeated? (A8)
As above.
Return to Quality Framework
Accessibility
The accessibility of statistical information refers to the ease with which it can be referenced by users. It includes the ease with which the existence of information can be ascertained, as well as the suitability of the form or medium through which the information can be accessed. |
How will the results of the survey be explained / presented to the major users? (I6)
Tables, analysis, graphs, and advice to users on how to interpret the results.
Which agency and area is responsible for the survey? (A2)
The survey is being conducted by the Australian Industry Group (Ai Group). It is being conducted under an Eco-Efficiency Agreement with the Department of Environment and Heritage. The Agreement is being managed by the Industry Partnerships Section, Environment Protection Branch, Department of Environment and Heritage.
Who is the survey manager and principal contact person for survey clearance? (A3)
Sophie Montgomery
Industry Partnerships Section
Telephone : (02) 6274 1671
Email : sophie.montgomery@ea.gov.au
What commitments have been made to preserve the confidentiality of respondents? How will these be implemented? (F3)
Confidentiality has been promised. Each unit included in the sample will be allocated a unique record number, and this will be the only identifier on the questionnaire.
Business names and other identifying features will also be kept separate from company data during survey processing, data entry and analysis.
In terms of survey output, only aggregated data will be published, with checks also made to ensure that information on individual firms cannot be identified within aggregated data.
Return to Quality Framework
Timeliness
The timeliness of statistical information refers to the delay between the reference point to which it pertains and the date on which the information becomes available. |
To what reference peiod(s) does the survey refer? (A6)
The reference period will be the 2002/03 financial year.
What is the timetable for the survey? (B3)
What is the expected total number of businesses you will attempt to contact (ie total sample size initially drawn)? How has this been set? (H4)
What allowances will be made for potential sources of non-sampling error in estimation? (I4)
An analysis of non-responding units will be undertaken.
Of the number of businesses reported in H5, how many businesses are expected to respond (ie the responding sample size)? (H6)
We expect 100 units will respond to the survey, a response rate of 20%.
This takes into account the following:
- members of the Australian Industry Group are more likely to respond to Australian Industry Group surveys than other non-compulsory surveys;
- typical response rates achieved by other Australian Industry Group surveys in the past.
What allowances have been made for expected non-response and frame deficiencies in the sample design? (H8)
If non-response rates are high in any particular strata, then follow up phone contact will be used to lift response rates in that strata.
As previously mentioned, we expect minimal defunct units on the frame.
In what ways does the coverage provided by the frame differ from the target population? (G6)
What testing of the questionnaire(s) has (have) taken place? (E5)
The questionnaire was tested in the week of 27 May 2002 with three member companies (small, medium and large) of the Australian Industry Group. Given AiG staff’s experience (of over 15 years) in designing and administering member and large national surveys, this was considered sufficient. The pilot largely confirmed expectations about the relevance and ease in completing the questionnaire for companies from small to large.
What consultations have taken place, other than testing, with businesses or business associations regarding availability of data items and data collection methods? (E6)
Consultations have taken place between the Australian Industry Group (industry body) and the Federal Department of the Environment and Heritage.
How many units are there on the frame? (G4)
The original frame had approximately 2,000 units.
What actions have been taken to overcome known frame deficiencies? (G7)
We have asked the respondent to provide their industry sector for output purposes.
Of the total number of businesses reported in H4, how many businesses are expected to be live and in scope? (H5)
We anticipate no less than 450 units will be live and in scope. There may be some non-live units, although this is expected to be minimal (maximum 5% of sample) as Australian Industry Group membership listings are constantly updated.
What evidence is there that the expected respondents will be representative of non-respondents? (H7)
Units on the frame are similar in terms of:
- membership to the Australian Industry Group; and
- industry sector (ie. Manufacturing).
Return to Quality Framework
Interpretability
The interpretability of statistical information reflects the availability of the supplementary information and metadata necessary to interpret and utilise it appropriately. It includes appropriate presentation of data such that it aids correction interpretation. |
How will the results of the survey be explained / presented to the major users? (I6)
Tables, analysis, graphs, and advice to users on how to interpret the results.
What sample design will be used, eg, census, stratified simple random sample? (H1)
The survey is a random sample.
What stratification has been used in the sample design? (H2)
The sample is stratified by company size. No strata will be completely enumerated, although the sample will be over-weighted towards large companies (employment over 100 persons) as these firms are expected to be involved in eco-efficiency arrangements more so than small firms. Respondent burden for small and medium sized firms has also been taken into account.
What allowances have been made for expected non-response and frame deficiencies in the sample design? (H8)
If non-response rates are high in any particular strata, then follow up phone contact will be used to lift response rates in that strata.
As previously mentioned, we expect minimal defunct units on the frame.
Will outliers be identified, and, if so, how will they be handled? (I2)
Outliers will be identified and excluded.
Will data be aggregated into statistical tables, and if so what are the estimation formulae for the principal output data items? (I3)
Data will be published in tabular form for selected data items by business size and industry, and will include averages and ratios.
What allowances will be made for potential sources of non-sampling error in estimation? (I4)
An analysis of non-responding units will be undertaken.
What statistical data analysis techniques will be performed? (I5)
Frequency distributions and regression analysis.
Return to Quality Framework
Coherence
The coherence of statistical information reflects the degree to which it can be successfully brought together with other statistical information within a broad analytical framework and over time. The use of concepts, classifications and target populations promotes coherence, as does the use of common methodology across surveys. |
Is the survey a new survey or a cycle of an existing repeated survey? (A7)
This is the second of three surveys, to be conducted annually in 2002, 2003 and 2004.
Is the survey to be conducted once only or repeated? If repeated, with what frequency is the survey to be repeated? (A8)
How will the frame be updated for future survey cycles? (G8)
The Australian Industry Group constantly updates member details to ensure accuracy as a priority. However, responses from the survey will be fed back to the membership list, particularly in relation to industry classification.
What consideration has been given to making data item definitions consistent between repeats of this survey or across other surveys? (D3)
The questionnaire has been designed such that questions are simple, and use terminology consistent with industry practices. This will help to ensure that data items remain consistent over the duration of the study.
What alternative sources of data are available and what use is made of them? (C1)
Some of the other signatories to the Eco-Efficiency Agreements have undertaken similar surveys, but given the differences in the member profiles, there was little scope to draw on their experiences and work. Nevertheless, the work being undertaken by the Chambers of Commerce and Industry in preparing their eco-efficiency survey was considered in preparing this survey
In 1999, the Ai Group and the Monash Centre for Environmental Management were funded by Environment Australia to undertake a ‘Survey of Productivity and Environmental Strategies and Practices in Australian Manufacturing Companies’. While the survey results were considered in the development of the Eco-Efficiency Survey, it was concluded that overall, the objectives and data outputs of the two surveys are quite different. Little use can therefore be made of the 1999 survey.
In what respects are these alternative sources insufficient? (C2)
The Ai Group / Monash University survey provides a useful resource of background information on the environmental approaches used by Ai Group members. The survey aimed to assess corporate environmental management practices in Australian manufacturing companies, with particular attention given to the linkages between environmental management practices, productivity initiatives, and competitive strategies.
While there is some overlap with the Eco-Efficiency Survey (on questions related to environment management strategies used by companies, eco-efficiency activities undertaken and information on environment management), overall the focus of this survey is rather on obtaining environmental input, output and expenditure data. Where there is overlap, correlations will be made between the two surveys. In general, however, the 1999 survey will provide some contextual and background information to the 2002 Eco-Efficiency Survey.
What consideration has been given to the use of standards? Please specify. (D2)
Benchmarking will be applied against standard sales figure. Questions have been designed to reflect industry terminology, practices and standards.
What consideration has been given to working with other agencies to make their data more suited to your needs? (C3)
Working with other agencies/organisations is not seen as appropriate in this instance due to the specialised nature of the data collected, the specific focus on Ai Group members, and the lack of existing information in this field.
Return to Quality Framework
-->
|